Showing posts with label BT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BT. Show all posts

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Week 6 in Telecoms, Internet, Media

Corporate

  • BT:  Hatch report (The Economic Impact of BT Group in the UK): gross value added (GVA) 2019/20 GBP 24b, supports 300k FTE, spent GBP 10.1 on UK suppliers, maintains 35k vehicles; spending by people on BT pension contributed GBP 2b, supports 26600 jobs
  • Proximus: Buys out Swisscom (22.4% for EUR 110m) and MTN (20.0% for EUR 107m = ZAR 1.8b, to record ZAR 1.2b book profit) from BICS for full ownership and strategic flexibility; EV EUR 569m = 4.4x EBITDA
  • Vodafone: Vantage Towers Moodys: Baa3, outlook stable
    • 45,500 fully controlled macro sites + 14,200 and 22,100 co-controlled macro sites in Cornerstone (50%) and INWIT (33.2%) JVs, 20/21 Adj EBITDA EUR 814m; debt EUR 2.3b, leverage 4.0 (Moodys: gross debt/EBITDA excl Cornerstone, INWIT 5.0x)
    • Positives: strong market positions, geographically well-diversified, high barriers to entry for competitors, high barriers to exit for customers, good earnings & cash flow predictability (supported by anchor long-term service contracts with Vodafone), expectation of medium-term EBITDA growth (driven by site additions, improving tenancies ratios, operational efficiencies)
    • Negatives: high customer concentration with Vodafone, short history of operating as a separate entity, expectation of negative free cash flow over the next 2 years (as a result of Vantage Towers' capital intensive model (7,100 contractual built-to-suit commitments that it is targeting over FY2022-FY2026) and planned dividend payments of EUR 280m to be paid in FY2022), starting net leverage of around 4.0x EBITDAaL with willingness to increase up to 5.5x
  • Telenet: 20Q4
    • Outlook 2021: rev (+1%) & Adj EBITDA (up 1-2%) to return to growth, Op FCF -1%, FCF 420-440m
    • Outlook 2018-2021: Op FCF CAGR lower end of current range 6.5-8.0%
    • Focus on 5 pillars: 1. Expand customer relations, 2. grow in B2B, 3. Customer approach simplified, digital-first, 4. Perfect networks, 5. Empower employees, agile structure
    • Eltrona deconsolidation [see 200225] reduces operationals from 21Q2: HP -47700, customers -9500, RGUs -18500, TV -9200, BB -5500, FT -3800
    • Other: expects to win VOO auction (21Q2), Wallonia may hold on to stake; talks with Fluvius on FTTH ongoing (currently full fiber for FTTO and greenfields); considers towers (>3000) monetisation in case of funding need or transformational transaction
  • MasMovil: Acquires controlling stake in Lucera: energy reseller
  • Vivendi: To spin off 60% of Universal Music Group (Tencent holds 20%, Vivendi to hold 20%) in IPO as special dividend end 2021 in Amsterdam 'to reduce Vivendi’s conglomerate discount'; EV EUR 30b; EGM 210329; Vivendi shareholders to receive 44%, Bollore Groupe (holds 27% of Vivendi) 16%; proposes ordinary div EUR 0.60 over 2020, AGM 210622
  • Twitter: 20Q4
    • outlook 21Q1: rev $940-1040m, oper income loss $0-50m
    • outlook 2021: headcount +20%, costs + expenses +25% (incl new datacenter), rev to grow faster than expenses, SBC expense $525-575m, capex $900-950m
    • CEO Jack Dorsey considers decentralised social network to be built by Bluesky team [see 191211]; plans to give people more choice over what they see through marketplace of algorithms
  • Match Group acquires Hyperconnect, $1.73b: social network S Korea, operates Azar (live video & audio chat platform) & Hakuna Live (live-streaming app for video & audio broadcasts)
  • Bumble: Sets IPO price at $43, to sell 50m shares - First trade $76.00, closes at $70.31

Networks

  • 5G
    • GSA report on 5G devices: total 558 announced (o/w 365 = 62% commercially available) in 20 form factors from 113 vendors, 294 smartphones & 113 FWA devices announced (o/w 251 resp 42 commercially available)
    • GSA report on 4G & 5G networks, technologies & spectrum: 806 commercial 4G networks (incl 421 FWA, 743 mobile); 156 invest in NB-IoT o/w 111 launched, 51 deply LTE-M; 413 operators in 131 countries invest in 5G (o/w 65 operators in SA 5G) o/w 144 in 61 countries commercially launched 5G
    • Qualcomm launches Snapdragon X65 5G Modem-RF System (gen 4 5G modem-to-antenna solution; Release 16, 10 Gb/s, sub-6 GHz & mmWave, AI antenna tuning tech, upgradeable architecture) & X62 (for mainstream adoption of mobile broadband)
    • Personal (= Telecom Argentina) launches 5G in Buenos Aires, Rosario using DSS
    • Omantel launches 5G, no extra charge
    • Asia Pacific Telecom develops 5G-supported smart robots, with Foxconn Global Network (FHnet), to operate over SA Private 5G
    • Verizon opens 5G for sub-brand Visible (supports e-SIM)
  • 6G
    • Fraunhofer (5 institutes: IIS, HHI, FOKUS, IAF, IZM) launches 6G Sentinel research; focus on THz (100-300 GHz; very small cells, beamforming (Massive MIMO) integrated), flexible networks
    • CEA-Leti launches 6G research project RISE-6G, with 13 partners (Orange, TIM, NEC; Chalmeers University, Aalborg University, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, University of Notthingam; Consorzion Nazionale Interuniversitario Italiano, Centre National de la Recherche Sceintifique; SNCF, Fiat); plans 'smart & energy-sustainable technology advances, on reconfigurable intelligent surfaces that will enable programmable control'
  • LEO
    • Starlink requests FCC designation as Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC) to comply for funding [see 201207] - Competitors (FBA, NTCA) oppose funding as Starlink to hit capacity ceiling (congestion) by 2028 (Starlink plans 12k sats, throughput per sat 20 Gb/s, peak bandwidth per user 1.7-2.7 Mb/s); Starlink current permission max 1m users, to raise to 5m
    • Telesat orders LEO fleet Lightspeed (at 1015 and 1325 km; Ka-band, first launch in 2 yr, commercial servivces 23H2) from Thales Alenia Space; total capacity with 298 sats 15 Tb/s, max data rates 7.5 Gb/s (20 Gb/s for hotspot)
    • Starlink beta to expand to ZA in 2022 (already in US, Canada, UK); opens for deposites, fulfilled on a first-come, first-served basis - And to Spain - And global, where legal
    • Starlink (SpaceX) considers IPO
  • FTTH
    • Fern Trading
      • Jurassic Fibre (= Fern Trading) launches service in Barnstaple, max 950 Mb/s; to cover 10k premises by summer 2021
      • Swhish Fibre (= Fern Trading; plans 250k HP in 33 towns, 10 Gb/s) plans expansion in South Buckinghamshire
      • Vorboss (plans 250k FTTP lines by 2022) 75% stake acquired by Fern Trading

Services

  • B2B
    • Deutsche Telekom: T-Systems adopts Cloud-First strategy, expands partnerships with AWS, Azure; to launch new cloud offering 210216
    • Swisscom: Acquires Webtiser (expertise in SAP Customer Experience, 40 omployees), expands SAP-unit to 440 employees
    • Multiscope Thuiswerk Monitor survey report NL: 44% of WFH staff (due to corona virus) bought office products, spending average EUR 359 = total EUR 400m; 48% received financial support from employer
    • Microsoft adds Bulletins (news, info) and Milestones (track progress of work items) apps for Teams
    • Metrigy report (survey of 476 firms): 47% of businesses globally use UCaaS

  • Wholesale
  • Mobile
  • Smart city
    • Plasencia (Spain) orders smart city solution for tourism from Red.es and Vodafone ES, EUR 374k
    • Sharing Cities program (London, Lisbon, Milan, Bordeaux, Burgas, Warsaw) reaches EUR 250m investments in retrofitting buildings with energy-saving measures, developing sustainable energy management systems for new & existing developments, shared electric mobility, smart street infrastructure
  • Video
  • Web services
  • Hardware
    • Amazon: Rumor: plans wall-mounted Echo device as smart home control by end 2021/early 2022; 10-13 inch, $200-250
    • Facebook: Rumor: plans Android-based smartwatch, with  health and fitness features

Regulation

  • Spectrum
    • Nkom (NO) plans 5G auction Sep 2021: 2.6 GHz band (2x70 MHz in 14 blocks of 2x5 (minimum price NOK 25m) + 1x50; cap 80 MHz), 3.6 GHz band (3400-3800; 4 blocks of 40 (minimum price NOK 100m), 24 blocks of 10; cap 120 MHz), consultation until 210409
    • Ancom (RO) plans 5G auction 21Q3 (700, 800, 1500, 2600, 3400-3800; procedures by 21Q2; plans consultation on 24 GHz band
  • FT: EC considers forced payments by platforms to publishers for using snippets in search results, news
  • EU decides on e-privacy guidelines


Sunday, November 22, 2020

Week 47 in Telecoms, Internet, Media

Corporate

Networks

  • General: Ookla Speedtest Global Index (Oct 20): global average FBB 88/47 Mb/s, MBB 39/12 Mb/s; FBB: Sing #1 (229 Mb/s), HK #2 (215), Romania #3 (189), Switzerland #4 (186), Thailand #5 (184), NL #26 (126); MBB: SK #1 (145), UAE #2 (130), China #3 (124), Qatar #4 (108), Qatar #4 (88), Australia #5 (88), NL #6 (88) 
  • FTTH: Nokia launches 25/25 PON solution (25G PON), based on Nokia Quillion chipset
  • 5G
    • Huawei proposes 5.5G (for XR: AR, VR, holography; Internet of Everything): to increase speed (2 Gb/s for 16K video), lower latency (5 ms), to support 100b connections by 2030; to add 3 scenarios (to eMBB, mMTC, URLLC): UCBC (Uplink Centric Broadband Communication; uplink x10), RTBC (Real-Time Broadband Communication; bandwidthe x10 for given latency & reliability), HCS (Harmonized Communication & Sensing; enables autonomous driving, Massive MIMO for sensing); requires more spectrum (sub 100 GHz), AI (limitless intelligence)
    • Vodafone Group CEO Nick Read:
      • "... dynamic spectrum sharing technology which operators use to show coverage but will essentially be 4G speeds." (currently used in NL, DE)
      • "Some operators are taking dynamic spectrum sharing…which is effectively giving you a 5G symbol but 4G performance. What we said as a company is, ‘No, we don’t want to do that. It will be misleading to consumers and businesses.’ What we want to do is 5G built right."
    • Ericsson ConsumerLab report Harnessing the 5G Consumer Potential: 5G consumer market $31t by 2030 o/w $3.7t for CSPs, ARPU may rise 34% by 2030
    • Rain (FWA ZA) performance (speed) drops due to congestion: from 17 Mb/s in 19Q4 to 11 Mb/s in 20Q3; plans to switch off 4G, to switch to SA 5G
    • 3 Denmark plans 5G launch Dec 2020, target nationwide mid 2022
    • Analysys Mason for Qualcomm, Ericsson: 5G action plan review for Europe report:
      • Use cases with highest impact smart factories, agriculture, FWA (suburban and rural areas), net benefit resp EUR 58, 37, 18b
      • Four key areas (Open Innovation Platform): Smart Production & Logistics (net benefit = benefit - cost EUR 68b), Smart Rural (55b), Smart Urban (29b), Smart Public Services (10b)
      • Environmental & social benefits from 5G connectivity. Worker safety, upskilled workforces, reduced carbon emissions & energy usage, less resource intensive production, social inclusivity, even import/export security; Open Innovation Platform may deliver EUR 208b in benefits at 46b cost (CBR cost-benefit ratio 4.5)
    • Elisa plans 5G-enabled video robots to enable doctors & nurses to interact with corona virus patients remotely.at HUS Helsinki University Hospital
    • Telekom DE plans 5G at Bonner SC football stadium, with live streaming on Sporttotal.tv via automatic 180° camera
    • IHS Market & Omdia for Qualcomm: The 5G economy in a post covid-19 era report on US, China, Japan, S Korea, UK, DE, FR: forecasts 2035 revised on corona virus impact: Sales enabled by 5G $13.1t, 5G-enabled job growth 22.8m, 5G capex + R&D $265b per annum
    • Vodafone IT plans smart city (smart mobility) trials in Genoa: remotely-controlled drones to monitor the safety of the city’s road network via a 3D reconstruction of the corresponding infrastructure; use of 5G-connected buses with HD video cameras to gather real-time data with a view to ensuring the maintenance of road surfaces
    • Bouygues plans 5G launch 201201, targets nationwide end 2021
    • Telenor DK launches 5G-3500 in Copenhagen, Aalborg (600k covered pops)
    • SFR (Altice FR) launches 5G in Nice; 40 EUR/mo for unlimited voice/text + 80 GB (EUR 5 more than for 4G)

Video

  • RTL
    • Distr deal Mediengruppe RTL DE for TVNOW Premium with Telekom DE (DT): free in bundle with Magenta TV Smart and Magenta TV Smart Flex subs (to be integrated; combined 60k hr of content); to partner in ad tech (Smartclip and Yospace, addressable TV ad trial 2021, with Telekom's emetriq), ad sales, content
    • Salto France TV, M6, TF1) reaches 100k subs after 3 weeks
  • DAZN: Distr deal with Vodafone DE: OTT + 2 linear channels, 10 EUR/mo
  • YouTube: Launches Audio Ads (15 sec, beta, auctioned on CPM basis) and ad-targetable music lineups (genres, Top 100 charts by country); total 70m tracks, 2b MAU, 15% of consumption is background music
  • Comcast
    • Universal Pictures partners with Cinemark for shortened theatrical window: if opening weekend generates >$50m, then theatrical window at least 31 days (5 weekends); if not, available for on demand after 17 days (3 weekends); rumor: terms extend to AMC
    • Hayu launches in DE, AT (via Amazon Prime Video Channels)
  • AT&T
  • Walt Disney
    • Hulu raises price of Hulu With Live TV by $10 to 65 $/mo
    • Disney+ launches in Latam
    • Rumor: Pinocchio, Peter Pan, Cruella may skip theaters to premiere on Disney+

Services & hardware

Regulatory

  • Telecoms
    • ACM (NL) proposes deregulation of Hoogwaardige Wholesaletoegang (HWT) over copper on business market over increased fiber-based alternatives, based on new Market Analysis; consultation until 210114
    • BIPT plans 5G auction end 2021 or early 2022
  • Apple: Privacy activist Max Schrems (noyb) complaint in DE, ES (under EU’s e-Privacy directive, not GDPR): iPhone tracking code IDFA (Identifier for Advertisers) lets Apple and all iPhone app developers see how users behave without their knowledge or agreement - Apple denies: does not use or access IDFA - Facebook: Apple data collection is about profits, not privacy


Monday, October 06, 2008

Update on separation, FTTH and 3-D

Here's a short update on some of the hottest topics around:
  • Separation. First of all, the Telecom New Zealand AGM rejected the election of the 'two Marks', put forward by Elliott International, to the board. They were in favor of structural separation, whereas Telecom right now focuses on operational separation and FTTN. A disappointing day, leaving the share price at a 16-year low ... However, good news related to functionally separated BT. The Register reports that it is considering outsourcing Openreach, putting the unit at an even longer arm's length. With Ben Verwaayen's departure to Alcatel-Lucent, it will come as no surprise that his new company could be a candidate for taking care of the job ... Finally, in Australia some people seem to be getting closer to structural separation as well, such as senator Minchin.
  • FTTH. Julio Linares, COO of Telefonica, spoke at Broadband World Forum Europe. Here are some quotes from Total Telecom: "We will have to measure content in zetabytes. It is difficult to identify future services, but ultra-broadband will facilitate more video, high-definition and 3D content, and more. Consumers are going to need more bandwidth. Demand for bandwidth on fixed and mobile networks will multiply at least by five in the next three years. To support this zetabyte era, we are going to need new infrastructure, we are going to need networks. We need new technology, but technology is not going to be the constraint. Investment is the constraint. To build fixed broadband across Europe, we need to invest €250 billion, but at present the industry is averaging investment of €50 billion per year. It will take 20 years to build just the fixed part of the new infrastructure. Do you think we can afford it? (...) of course, no. (...) We need to speed up. At this time of economic crisis, it is very important to take into account the weight of our industry on the whole economy."
  • 3-D. Philips has demonstrated 3-D VoD ('2D-plus-depth') at the IBC conference last month, branded WOWvx. It doesn't require special glasses, it's what they call an 'autostereoscopic display', basically consisting of an LCD display plus a lot of lenses covering the pixels. Both Deutsche Telekom and Orange have trialed the system. Even more recently, Philips showed its new Quad Full TV (thanks dear readers!), basically using the same technology but with everything brought together in a prototype TV.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

I Will Bring You Down, Baby

Everybody seems Himmelhoch jauchzend over Ben Verwaayen as Alcatel-Lucent's new CEO. Following a very sound tradition, here are some second thoughts. After all, he's Dutch and so am I; he's getting his hands on millions and I'm not. So, I will bring you down, baby.
  • Didn't BT's success largely hinge on the exploding broadband market? And can Ben take the credit for that?
  • Did it not also hinge on BT's functional separation? And wasn't that only accepted when the regulator (erstwhile Oftel) threatened to refer competion issues to the Competition Commission?
  • Didn't Ben come with some pretty outrageous targets in April 2002 (2 months after he started work at BT), such as a revenue CAGR of 6-8% for the years through 2004/2005 and mobile revenues of GBP 500m after 5 years (it was less than GBP 300m in the year 2006/2007)? It wasn't long before Ben became a little more cauteous and said he merely wanted to raise revenues, EBITDA, EPS and dividends on an annual basis.
  • A new MVNO deal with Vodafone (May 2004) was supposed to bring in GBP 1bn in revenues after 5 years. Well, it wasn't Ben's fault that BT sold off mmO2 (back in 2001) - and with it all sense of the mobile market.
  • Isn't Britain stuck in broadband middle ages called ADSL2+, with FTTH not really in sight?
Of course, there was lots of good stuff too, such as broadband and EBITDA margins.
So congrats, Ben!

Thursday, July 17, 2008

FTTH and cable open access require more common sense

Two major announcements this week - and both (BT's 'super-fast broadband' and OPTA's open access to cable decision) are quite hollow, to a degree.

Benoit rightly quotes Karl Bode on BT's "Fiber to the press release".

And the OPTA (the Dutch NRA) decision on open access to cable doesn't look like it will lead to very much either. Not only is it limited to services-based competition, analogue TV and anybody-but-KPN, there is more.
A pair of distingusihed readers points me to the tiny detail of getting the rights to all cable channels. Should a channel, for some reason, object, then the new entrant (the service provider) will have to provide each customer with a filter (at his home) to block that channel. This is an arduous task, both from a financial and a technical point of view. And the thing is: the channel owner may not have such lofty motives - like being owned by the cable operator.
There is also an issue around an information channel from the operator, which is hard to filter out as well.

Let's hope that Ofcom and OPTA will show more common sense when regulation (of both FTTH and cable open access) takes shape.

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Update on FTTH

There has been a large amount of news on many aspects of FTTH this month alone. Here is an overview, using my own classification (details and hyperlinks are in my updated FTTH 2007 & 2008 database).


Deployments
  • This month several US muninetworks were announced or reported on: Rosemount (Minn), St. Paul, Glenwood Springs (Col), Smithville (Ind), Salisbury and Wilson (NC), Rutland (VT; hitting a bump), Highland (Ill).
  • In the Netherlands, KPN and BreedNet are stepping up their FTTB (business parks) efforts (Huizen, Urk).
  • Etisalat has plans for the UAE.

Demand, usage, penetration, VAS
  • The FTTH Council North America reported 12m homes passed, etc.
  • The World Economic Forum released its 'Global Information Technology Report 2007-2008'. The free web-based version is great to toy around with.
  • Wilson (NC) targets a mere 30% penetration to make the business case work.
  • Keep an eye on CERN and its Large Hadron Collider (LHC), to be operational this summer. Processing power (and even power supply) are too limited on a local level, forcing the institution to go international. The grid is made avaliable to other researchers. Who knows, in the future it will be the basis of a superfast internet, enabling cloud computing, holographic video conferencing, etc.
  • BT is buying Wire One. It appears to be a reseller of all the usual suspects, including Cisco. It will be a while, but I am sure telepresence will be made available to the masses at some point and be a FTTH driver.

Financing: PPP and other
  • BT asked for some exemption from USO (united service obligations) in exchange for committing to fiber.
  • In New Zealand, Peter Macaulay proposed a Fibre Fund to which investors could contribute and anyone could draw upon. "The fund will enable councils to enter public-private partnerships drawing on a common fund rather than drawing money from ratepayers or telco customers. The investors will want to stay in rather than looking for a quick repayment of a loan." He, as well as the New Zealand Institute, misteriously predict that the value of the network will increase over time. That is a bit funny from a DCF point of view (which implies that everything is discounted to the present day), but what they obviously mean to say is: more fiber can cheaply be blown through the ducts; gear (WDM) can be added; usage will go up.
  • In the US, Glenwood Springs and Wilson count among muninetworks financed by bonds to be paid (interest) for by subscriber fees.
  • Smithville seems to count on a government grant from the Department of Agriculture.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

BT's Ebbsfleet project needs some work

A short follow-up to my earlier post on the BT project in Ebbsfleet. A couple of Communications Breakdown MUVRs (mega ueber value readers, pronounce MOVERs - thanks James) reported:
  • Keith McMahon mailed me about the project back in July.
  • Dirk van der Woude adds some pricing details from one of his own MUVRs (also see the Guardian). Ebbsfleet could be less than spectacular. The top tier product is asymmetrical (e.g. 100/2 Mb/s) at a rather expensive price point (530 GBP/yr = 707 EUR/yr ex VAT at the wholesale level). Compare that to Iliad/Free's famous 30 EUR/mo = 360 EUR/yr (at the retail level). Dirk also adds 'his own' tariffs, at Citynet in Amsterdam: 20/20 Mbps for 300 EUR/yr (retail, incl VAT) in the first two years.

BT to launch its first OA residential FTTH network

Bravo to BT. Its first residential FTTH network will launch in August in Kent (a greenfield housing development called Ebbsfleet Valley, with Land Securities). The 10k homes are offered a wonderful 100 Mb/s. And it's open access too! I wonder who will be service providers, except for BT Retail.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

The Investment Incentive Problem

Do monopolies lack an incentive to invest? I suppose they did in the ‘old world’, where business was guaranteed and a government-based owner didn’t care much about maximizing value.

However, things are different in today’s telco marketplace. Governments have largely backed out and the market has taken over. Monopolies are on the brink of extinction. Add to that the natural monopoly of fiber (which gets to be pushed deeper into networks everyday, until we will finally end up at homes (FTTH) and businesses (FTTB) networks) and the rise of IP (which is indifferent to whatever is inside a packet, be it voice, video or data), and what do we get?

Exactly, new monopolies of all-IP, all-fiber networks – whoever may own them.

Now, does the investment incentive problem still exist? I believe not, as long as owners are sensible and try to maximize the value.

Maximizing value in the first place means, quite simply, maximizing sales and thus the number of clients. This entails the end of the retail/wholesale dichotomy and an appreciation of doing business on the wholesale level, as I have stressed before. Competitors should now be looked upon as partners and clients too.

Of course, investing can also have a different purpose: cutting costs in the long run. This is why investing in NGNs and NGAs makes perfect sense.

Attracting wholesale clients entails expanding your portfolio of services, which implies investing in every aspect of your business. Different wholesale clients will focus on different market segments (which at the same time relieves your retail division of marketing to all those different niches), each demanding a different portfolio of services.

It also entails entering adjacent markets. Take a look at utility companies building BPL networks (run by third party service providers) to capture a piece of the broadband market, but also to cut costs (using the network for monitoring services).

In a word, ‘sweat your assets’, as Telefonica’s Santiago Fernández so eloquently put it.

This reasoning is why I keep being surprised when I read about incumbents claiming that (structural) separation would take away the incentive to invest. Which by the way seems to be the conventional wisdom. In the wake of the new EC regulations, telcos like France Telecom (c. 30% state-owned) and Belgacom (53% state-owned) have been making such statements. No Telco 2.0 points for them, I presume.

(PS: BT is quite explicit over their separation costs. Would it be a weird idea to allow incumbents to pass on any separation cost to the government?)

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Cool news: FTTH, M&A, SMS, products and services

Here is some recent and noteworthy stuff, with just a few words of my own:

FTTH:

  • Gaining a lot of momentum. I just updated my private litle database, a Google spreadsheet that you can also access on the right (under 'Fiber Ring').
  • Of note: OEN (Houston) closes its network, SureWest may buy the assets.

Takeover speculation:

Cool new products:

  • Everex is launching a Google-friendly PC, the Green gPC, with Google apps pre-loaded or given easy access to. I suppose that is an 'asset-light' entry into the PC-market.
  • Amazon Kindle, Kindle Store and Whispernet. Many comments widely available. Connectivity is included - very much a Telco 2.0 strategy. A European launch will be hampered by lengthy negotiations with operators.

Cool new services:

  • Celtel in Africa is launching 'One Network', essentially a roaming deal turning 12 networks into one. Calling at local rates, automatic activation, no sign-up or fee.
  • Cox is stretching its network towards 1 Gbps bandwidth.
  • BT is negotiating e-health business opportunities in Qatar and neighbouring states. I think e-health is a multi-billion opportunity, where many participants meet. That will allow operators like BT to become the center of an ecosystem.
  • Jajah is launching an opt-in service where advertisements replace ring-back tones. They say it takes an average 12 seconds before people answer a call. I suppose they will not allow competitors into the advertising network.

Ever new SMS-based apps:

  • Zain launched automatic translations (Arabic/English).
  • SpinVox enables voice-to-text conversion and has a deal with Skype: a voice message will be converted into an SMS. Also several operator deals (Alltel, Vodacom, Telstra a.o.).
  • Kajeet, an MVNO on Sprint, launched 'Feeds': entertainment and information pushed to the user as an SMS, at 10 c/SMS.
  • Mobile payments using SMS, e.g. Safaricom in Kenya and Base in Belgium. Proximus (Belgium) launched public transportation ticketing by SMS.
  • KPN's 'flirting service' olllo uses SMS (priced at 55 cents!).

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

FTTH ultimately drives separation (2)

Will functional (or even structural) separation happen to the European telcos?
Several countries (Poland, Italy, Australia), operators (Telecom New Zealand, TeliaSonera, eircom and of course BT) and the EC seem to be moving in that direction.

Here are the external forces driving or slowing down the movement. They differ from country to country, but the end-game is the same everywhere (FTTH), so separation will happen - sooner or later.
  • Cable competition (i.e. inter market): forestalls separation. Sufficient BB market competition was a reason for OPTA to say that KPN needn't be separated (aside from OPTA not having the legal means to enforce it).
  • Intra market competition: drives separation. BT is a prime example. The creation of Openreach kickstarted LLU.
  • Wholesale offers: forestall separation. Here KPN is the perfect example. Moving from LLU (with fiber to the MDF locations) to SLU (with fiber to the cabinet), it managed to agree on MoUs with the nations largest unbundlers (Tele2/Versatel, TI's bbned and DT's Orange). In other words, no need to kickstart SLU by separating KPN.
  • FTTH: drives separation. As this is the end-game, separation I believe is inevitable.

Here is my view of the future:

Nobody wants two FTTH networks, even duct sharing isn't sufficient. KPN resorts to being a service provider in Almere on the Reggefiber network, and UPC will be marginalized unless it follows KPN. The physical layer (the fiber) will be a monopolist utility. It will need to be regulated only once service providers start complaining over rates or services.


Friday, October 05, 2007

Telcos should embrace the wholesale market

Yesterday I had a short meeting with an industry executive in my hometown Utrecht. Another very valuable meeting - by way of reality check.

We mainly discussed two topics.


1. Wholesale

I think of wholesale as a very attractive business. Obviously, there is a strong connection to the separation stance.
In the old days, incumbents like KPN instructed managers pretty explicitly to frustrate their wholesale clients. Even today, Deutsche Telekom thinks it can only recoup their FTTN/VDSL investments by demanding a regulatory holiday, effectively allowing its retail organisation sole access.
Now, this is all reversing – maybe not at DT but I do think at KPN (a finalist for Light Reading’s Awards). More incumbents acknowledge that independent service providers (let’s call them BSPs) have something to add – things that are not in the incumbents’ DNA. Think innovation. Also, marketing to specific niches can handily be left to focused BSPs.

Linked to this is the telco stance that the investment incentive supposedly disappears when full (structural or ownership) separation is forced upon the company by the regulator. Again, I do not see this. Extending the portfolio, and opening the platform to third-party developers, looks like a sound business strategy to me. It will attract BSPs large and small. Sure, investing carries risk, but that’s part of doing business, isn't it?

Speaking of which – applications. Please allow me to wander off for a moment. I have been putting together a very short overview.

Fixed
Back in April, BT took the lead by restructuring and establishing a BT Design and BT Operate unit, granting developers access plus a SDK. AT&T may be planning a similar move.

IPTV
See my post on Orca Interactive and SeaChange. IPTV seems to me the one area that could benefit most from adding apps, in order to strengthen the telco vis-a-vis
the cableco or satco.

Internet
Facebook did very well, allowing third-party developers access to the APIs, even if monetization is not quite so easy. In any case, the apps worked well for the valuation of Facebook.
Yahoo! may follow.

Mobile
Motorola launched a ‘solutions Catalog’ into beta to invite third-party developers.

2. KPN

Few will contest the strategic logic of the string of acquisitions (Telfort, Tiscali NL, Getronics, iBasis, etc.) by the Dutch incumbent, KPN. Right now, it looks like brand rationalisation will happen, but what does that mean when the company has a multi-brand strategy?
Of the above takeovers, obviously Tiscali is the one that will have to return its brand to the mothership in Italy. Normally, they would probably have 36 months or so. After that, I think KPN will revert to one of the existing brands. I guess XS4ALL, the premium brand, could be a candidate.

So, which holes are left in the KPN portfolio? After the Tele2 Belgium deal (which effectively precludes a Belgacom merger), KPN may shift its attention to Germany. I think E-Plus will be beefed up by an LLU operator. Some are not for sale (subsidiaries of Vodafone, Telefonica and Telecom Italia), many others probably lack sufficient network coverage. What’s left is Versatel Germany or QSC. The latter has a wholesale business only, so combining it with E-Plus may not be a bad idea at all.

Finally, for my readers at Belgacom – check out this Trouw article (in Dutch) on Reggefiber, the stealth FTTH builder in the Netherlands. Get back at those KPN guys who bought Tele2 Belgium, and enter the Netherlands by buying Reggefiber!
Some will argue that owning an (open access) network is at the lower end of the value chain, but I believe it can produce great returns, especially since a FTTH network is future proof. Granting independent BSPs open access not only allows you into the wholesale market, it will keep the regulator happy too. Furthermore, you can always start or buy your own retail organisation!

UPDATE (thanks Dirk 'FTTH' van der Woude: "It's been quite a while since I last reported something remarkable from the Netherlands, but I think this falls in that category.")
Reggefiber and KPN are teaming up in Almere, reports Trouw. That adds a twist to any Belgacom/Reggefiber speculation. Of course, all we need is a single FTTH network. KPN and Belgacom could dump all their FTTH assets into a Reggefiber Joint Venture and turn into service providers.
Here is an English translation of the Vincent Dekker story (translated by Vincent himself):

KPN has decided to join forces with Reggefiber to speed up the roll out of FTTH in Almere, the fifth largest city in The Netherlands. Reggefiber already owns some networks in smaller towns and in parts of cities, like the project in Amsterdam. This time they will build a network for the whole of Almere. KPN will deliver services on that network. It will bean open network though, so KPN will have no monopoly on it.
Then why would KPN do this? Well, I'm not sure, but it looks as if KPN has no other options. KPN is losing customers in great numbers to the TV-cable networks nowadays. These networks can offer full triple play, whereas KPN kan only deliver ADSL and telephony on its network. IPTV is not a success as yet. And its Digitenne (DVB-T) is also not good enough to really compete with the cablecos. KPN has a plan to roll out All-IP in the next 4 years, which is fiber to the street cabinets and old copper from there to the homes, but this VDSL will also not be good enough to protect marketshare.
So KPN needs FTTH badly. In Almere Reggefiber was already chosen to build the FTTH network and now KPN has decided to join forces with Reggefiber. It will encourage its customers to switch from the KPN POTS network to the fiber network. That should make the new network profitable in a very short time. On that network it will most probably not only offer very fast internet (100/100 to start with) and cheap IP telephony, but also DVD-quality analog video and digital hdtv. With that offering people might be persuaded not to switch to the cable company and even drop that cablecompany for their tv-service. In the Netherlands some 90 percent of all homes now still get TV via cable, the rest via satellite and a few percent via Digitenne.
KPN will keep its POTS network alive for the time being, but that can't last very long. So in a few years this incumbent will no longer own a network that covers the whole of the country. My guess is that Almere could very well be the start of much more cooperation between Reggefiber and KPN in other parts of the Netherlands, Amsterdam and other big cites to start with. KPN needs a network to compete witch cable, and it needs it fast. The news of todaycould therefore be good news for everybody in The Netherlands: the start of a national FTTH network at last. We're a few years behind Japan and quite a few other countries already, so it certainly is not too soon...
Almere is an interesting city for FTTH. The cable company there is UPC, owned by Liberty Global of John Malone. If Almere will show the same pattern as seen in other towns where Reggefiber already has fibernetworks, UPC can expect to lose some 70 percent of its customers in the next 2.5 years. After Amsterdam and Rotterdam Almere is UPC’s biggest market. So losing most of its customer there will hurt. And ater Almere, Amsterdam or Rotterdam could be next on the agenda of Reggefiber and KPN.
KPN has decided its POTS network in Almere has only marginal residual value. That's one message we got today. How long will it take before cable companies will admit that this is true for their network too?

Monday, July 02, 2007

The BCE bid implies 20% upside at KPN and 30% at BT

Pensioen funds and private equity are performing an LBO at BCE. Its valuation, 7.8 times EBITDA over the trailing twelve months, implies an equivalent bid level of EUR 14.93 at KPN (a 21% upside) and GBP 438 (a 31% premium) for BT.

Check out the underlying calculations in this Google Spreadsheet.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

FTTH is the endgame (but it will take a while)

Yesterday I attended the 'Next Generation Network Conference', hosted by Euromoney's Global Telecoms Business, in Amsterdam. Thanks for inviting me!
It was an interesting day, even if there wasn't so much really new. I enjoyed talking to telco and vendor officials, most notably Dirk 'Amsterdam' van der Woude.
Below I will summarize my take of the views on a number of trends (which I regularly write about on this blog):
  • FTTH, VDSL/LLU/regulation 2.0, Web 2.0, SaaS, WIMAX
  • Separation, co-op
  • Owning the customer, advertising as a business model
Companies and organisations represented included:
  • KPN, BT, Vodafone, Orange NL, Thus, 2 smaller Dutch MSOs (CAIW and Kabel Noord)
  • Xconnect, Alcatel-Lucent, BroadSoft, Sonus, AlwaysON
  • OPTA (the Dutch NRA)
  • Analysys, Fitch

1. Demand

The perennial question: will 10 Mbps be enough? or 100 Mbps? Some statements (not precise quotations) included:
  • There is no ceiling (KPN),
  • even if the new services are as yet unspecified (Analysys).
  • Why should the exponential increase stop now(BT)?
My comment:
  • KPN, through Nico Baken (senior strategist and professor at Delft University), proved to be among the most radical. By the way, when I asked Nico how he feels about KPN's current strategy, he responded somewhat in this manner: KPN is among the most respected telcos, and they allowed me to hire 12 PhD's to work on long-term strategies, in order to allow KPN to maintain its lead. Bravo Eelco Blok for gathering this team at the heart of KPN!

2. FTTH, NGA (access)

Statements included:
  • We see no business case, except for greenfield operations (BT).
  • FTTH is the endgame (OPTA, KPN).
  • Build-outs in the Netherlands (7.0m households) are projected to go from 115k at present to 580k by 2009.
  • Public/private partnerships (PPP) will emerge (KPN).
  • Wireless will be the way to connect over the 'last few meters' (KPN).
  • Within a few years, all munifiber in the Netherlands will be bought by either KPN or Cablecos (CAIW).
  • 2 Infrastructures (copper/telco and coax/cableco) are not enough to ensure real competition (OPTA).

My comments here:

  • KPN's Nico Baken was probably among the most impressive in his presentation. His visionary analysis underscores that KPN fundamentally believes in FTTH - as well as PPP!
  • Dirk pointed me to a new development: KPN plans to connect 11k homes in the eastern town of Enschede and eventually the entire city (155k inhabitants) will be covered. "We will try to convince any doubters that copper access is not sufficient in tomorrow's world." I suspect that OPTA's 580k number (see above) does not include Enschede, which would take the number up to 735k. By the way, Dirk added a new overview (as of June) of fiber developments to the Citynet site.
  • There was surprisingly little on VDSL. I feel that everybody present believes in FTTH, which makes VDSL a transitory if not outmoded technology before it is even launched.
  • OPTA's acknowledgement of FTTH as the endgame is positive (in fact, it was aired before, most recently last week), but saying that 'two is not enough' is puzzling (to put it mildly). I would say: all we need is one (FTTH), which needs to be regulated. I feel that OPTA regards LLU and even bitstream access as a separate infrastructure.
  • Now, if even KPN feels that PPP is the way to go, separation makes more and more sense to me. How about separating both the telco (KPN) and cableco ('Zesco') networks - which I feel could stimulate the two new network companies to build a nationwide FTTH network through some PPP/joint venture (with Reggefiber).

3. NGN (core)

Statements:

  • The 21CN project started out as a cost savings measure, but grew into a complete business transformation (BT).
  • We offer NGN as part of our 'Business Transformation Partner' offering (Alca-Lu).
  • NGN implies cost savings, but at first a 'hump' will appear in capex and opex spend (Alca-Lu, BT). BT sees costs at a low in 2013, when the hump is coming to an end and normal growth is resumed (at a level less than half of what it is now).
  • BT established BT 21C Global Venture as a way to leverage its know-how that it is acquiring, doing the 21CN project (BT).
  • Apart from cost savings, NGN is all about new services (BT, Alca-Lu) for which SOA must be adopted (BT).
  • Telecom New Zealand wants to be a service provider and is less interested in being a network operator (Alca-Lu).
  • Altnets lack scale for NGN projects (Orange NL).

My comments:

  • SOA and SaaS will be recurring themes for telcos,
  • As well as separation. One could say that separation (and Saas) are ways of taking outsourcing to the extreme.
  • I wonder how the BT 21C Global venture fits into the IT services market. Do they have customers yet?
  • I will pound on one of my favorite subjects once more: why on earth do we see so few co-ops?

4. New services

Statements:

  • Future services will include HDTV, social networking, software apps and Web 2.0. Many may not be really new but subsititutes. "New services are as yet unspecified", and business models are unclear (Analysys).
  • Many new services, such as triple play, aren't really new. Blending however (like on-screen caller notification) is what we will be seeing a lot of (Alca-Lu).
  • In offering IPTV, we focus on interactivity, not on exclusive content. We will offer "what is relevant for our customers" (KPN).
  • We aim at personalisation (Vodafone).
  • Data may actually make up for much of mobile growth decline, but IPTV will not do the same for fixed operators (Fitch).
  • "The customer experience needs vast improvement." (Fitch)

My comments:

  • Somebody mentioned that it is all about "owning the customer". I couldn't agree more. That is also why I question KPN's representation of WLR, which I believe distorts their net line loss numbers. Sure, WLR still adds to wholesale revenues, but the customer relationship is gone.
  • I wasn't terribly impressed with KPN's IPTV ('Mine') presentation. The service will be (re)launched after the summer, but not as a premium service anymore. The UI didn't look very fancy. The feedback they had so far (the low key launch was done in May 2006) must be a long shot at what they overambitiously describe as "what is relevant for our customers".
  • Blending sounds like mash-ups, in Web 2.0 terms.
  • Selling to Google or KPN is one business model, and otherwise it seems to be advertising. Sure, budgets move online and can be targeted a lot better, but in the end online advertising will prove to be a cyclical market. The Broadband Incentive Problem kind of raises the same issue: in the long run, things need to be paid for, preferably in a usage based (not flat-fee) model.

5. Other

  • I spoke to Orange NL and other people, who all seem to believe that T-Mobile will not dispose of the Wanadoo BB unit of Orange NL, once the acquisition is worked out. I always assumed that T-Mobile would be a mobile-only play (outside their home markets in Germany and Eastern Europe) in the US, the Netherlands, Austria, the Czech Republic. But who knows they will embrace the convergence story.
  • On the side, if T-Mobile do embrace a convergence model, selling T-Mobile USA must come into play again (remember the cablecos work with Sprint and the satellite companies teamed with Clearwire, so teaming with a fixed or WiMAX operator seems hard).
  • I am getting pretty fed up with people saying that the end user is not interested in technology - to the point that I start to feel that people are increasingly familiar with alphabet soup.
  • On the side, WiMAX was touted by someone in the audience as a technology capable of bypassing cellular networks in large cities. I do not wish to be overskeptical about new technologies, but I think we have to be realistic. It is an emerging technology, especially 16e (there are many 16d deployments underway, including Vodafone's Malta plans). Handset range will be a major issue. At first, the technology was supposed to deliver 70-120 Mbps over a distance of 50 km. Now, 16d seems to deliver perhaps 10 Mbps over 5 km (in a NLOS situation). Imagine what the performance will be for 16e, assuming the kind of usage we see in cellular networks today. And then I haven't mentioned building the network, from construction, backhaul and interconnect up to marketing ...
  • Not to end on a sour note: Xconnect is a very interesting story. Peering is a whole new way of saving costs (and enabling new services). In fact, it is like OTC trading. Actually, I included peering in my own overview of efficiency measures (including such seemingly unrelated things like DWDM, CDN, P2P, MPEG-4 and AJAX) at my Tiscali Wholesale presentation two weeks ago. Mail me for that presentation.

Monday, March 05, 2007

The market will decide on regulation 2.0 in the Netherlands

OPTA, in its 'late February' (February 30, aka March 2) letter, has decided to let the market come up with an alternative for LLU. KPN will not be separated, neither functionally (Openreach style) nor structurally.

(As fiber is pushed deeper into the network, LLU will be replaced by SLU.)

Market parties (KPN, the ACT body (excluding bbned), bbned and Reggefiber) responded to OPTA's January 24 letter and are in talks. OPTA will monitor the process and expects a solution within 3 months. By 07Q2 it will publish both findings and rulemakings.

Further, OPTA has asked NERA to look into options for Openreach-style separation of KPN in the Netherlands. Unsurprisingly, NERA concludes that there are some large differences between the Dutch v. the British market: national cable coverage; Dutch regulators legally cannot force structural separation upon KPN (Ofcom threatening BT to refer the case to the Competition Commission was instrumental in getting the company to cooperate); service-based competition on the PTT-network takes away the stimulus for both altnets & PTT to invest in the local loop (FTTH).

In other words, the reach of cable and KPN's willingness to work with altnets stave off the threat of separation (functional or structural).