FTTH: Axia NetMedia, separation, FTTN and SLU

Three important developments this week in FTTH:

• Axia NetMedia (discussed before) detailed its plans for Australian NBN. If they have it their way, they will build FTTP, not FTTN.
• The same firm bids on the active layer of the Singapore network (NGNBBN), with Cisco. It's somewhat puzzling to see Axia bid alone (on the Australian NBN, but naturally they need partners), with SingTel (on the NGNBBN passive layer), or against SingTel but with Cisco (here). Maybe there's room to band together before contracts are signed.
• Swisscom has the revolutionary idea of laying 4 fibers to each home in its FTTH plans. It will use one itself, leaving room for three competitors to engage in infrastructure-based competition.

Plus: a worthwile interview. with TransACT's former CTO Paul Brooks. Question: "Telstra said it is 'impossible' to build or maintain a network if structural separation is enforced, is this true?" Answer: "No, of course not. They might not enjoy the same levels of cross-subsidisation they currently access regarding basic network infrastructure costs and high value-add retail products, but that's an economic argument, not an argument about whether it is possible or not. (...) If the wholesale arm actually had incentive to make things easy for their customers, then the business case for the separated retail arms becomes even stronger."

Plus: an Australian opposes sub-loop unbundling (SLU), but a New Zealander points to the reality of it, albeit it in FTTN + VDSL deployments.

KPN: away from network ownership and toward FTTH

Today I had the honor to meet with Joost Farwerck, director of Wholesale and Operations at KPN. Most striking were unequivocal belief in FTTH ('the endgame', as I have referred to it before) and an apparent decline in interest in being a network operator.
Joost very tellingly was able to see me in between a trip to Australia and New Zealand and a meeting with bbned (Telecom Italia).

Here are my edited notes.

1. All-IP

• KPN is planning the migration to an NGN, as I have written about before. Many MDF locations, LLU and ADSL2+ will be phased out and replaced by SDF locations, SLU and VDSL2. Fiber will be pushed deeper into the network, to reach all the way to 28k street cabinets (FTTC) and bypassing 1300 MDF locations. No FTTH as yet, only in greenfields and selected towns (Enschede and Almere).
• Currently, details of an MoU are worked out. The MoU was signed over the summer by both KPN and the main unbundlers (bbned, Tele2 and Orange). The new agreement is to be published around December 15. The details are about phasing out the MDF locations, the migration and KPN will present an alternative to line sharing (this product is on the way out anyway, as it is replaced by full LLU). Apparently, street cabinets offer enough space for SLU. Bbned is going the way of SLU.

2. Network operator v. service operator

• KPN believes WBA (wholesale broadband access) is a good product that will ensure competition, based on equivalent access.
• Joost seems to think that OPTA nor the new EU regulations, will lead to functional separation. I think KPN is a case in point where proper accounting separation and a good wholesale strategy + portfolio can fend off functional separation.
• By the way, accordin g to Joost, a wholesale customer can be more valuable than a low-end retail client.
• Outsourcing is becoming a major part of KPN's strategy. At Joost's division up to 50% of current employment levels will disappear.
• Joost seems to be much more of a services man than a network operator. I have noticed this before at both Tiscali and Telecom New Zealand. Network control is less important in a regulated all-IP world.

3. Co-op

• I am a big fan of cooperation. So is Joost, but challengers seem to think differently. KPN tried to team with Tele2/Versatel several years ago, but was turned down. Also, unbundlers are sub-scale in many cases, but (foreign) owners appear to be 'believers', as Joost put is. They all seem to think that they can make it work on their own. Too bad that there are few G9 (Australia) type of intitiatives.
• Joost seems to be similarly at a loss when it comes to long-term commitment of the large Dutch unbundlers. Tele2 is selling off many assets; T-Mobile may sell on the Orange BB unit; Telecom Italia may get rid of bbned.

4. FTTH

• "FTTH is the endgame". I couldn't agree more.
• However, VDSL gets deployed 5-7 times faster (and is written-off in 3-4 years), so it cannot be skipped. Here Joost is very much on the same track as Belgacom.
• KPN recently teamed with 'public enemy #1', Reggefiber, for the city of Almere. Joost told me they will own the passive infrastructure together (I was under the impression it would be 100% Reggefiber); KPN will serve as network operator; KPN (and others, if they wish) will be service provider.
• KPN beefed up its Belgian mobile operator by acquiring Tele2 Belgium. That obviously begs the question: will E-Plus make a similar move in Germany? Joost seems to see better business opportunities for some German expansion (out of the Netherlands), e.g. to the Ruhr area, than for doing FTTH in some rural Dutch areas.

FTTH ultimately drives separation (2)

Will functional (or even structural) separation happen to the European telcos?
Several countries (Poland, Italy, Australia), operators (Telecom New Zealand, TeliaSonera, eircom and of course BT) and the EC seem to be moving in that direction.

Here are the external forces driving or slowing down the movement. They differ from country to country, but the end-game is the same everywhere (FTTH), so separation will happen - sooner or later.

• Cable competition (i.e. inter market): forestalls separation. Sufficient BB market competition was a reason for OPTA to say that KPN needn't be separated (aside from OPTA not having the legal means to enforce it).
• Intra market competition: drives separation. BT is a prime example. The creation of Openreach kickstarted LLU.
• Wholesale offers: forestall separation. Here KPN is the perfect example. Moving from LLU (with fiber to the MDF locations) to SLU (with fiber to the cabinet), it managed to agree on MoUs with the nations largest unbundlers (Tele2/Versatel, TI's bbned and DT's Orange). In other words, no need to kickstart SLU by separating KPN.
• FTTH: drives separation. As this is the end-game, separation I believe is inevitable.

Here is my view of the future:

Nobody wants two FTTH networks, even duct sharing isn't sufficient. KPN resorts to being a service provider in Almere on the Reggefiber network, and UPC will be marginalized unless it follows KPN. The physical layer (the fiber) will be a monopolist utility. It will need to be regulated only once service providers start complaining over rates or services.

Does anybody want to compete in the Netherlands?

As I've written before, LLU is coming to and end in the Netherlands. France Telecom yesterday in a way referred to this, meandering on its strategy regarding Orange NL.

The consequences of the next stage in copper-based competion:

• KPN thinks it's so clever, forcing the competition out of the market. Only a player like KPN can afford to build a FTTC + VDSL network ('All-IP'). However, the plans could backfire: OPTA could go the separation route; OPTA could allow UPC to merge with @Home to form an MSO with near-national coverage (and create a duopoly US style); altnets could band together Australian style (the G9 consortium, proposing a FTTN network of its own).
• OPTA, the local NRA, together with all market participants, is studying a Full Alternative for LLU. Could it be SLU (FTTC + unbundling from the street cabinet)?
• Altnets have invested very little over the past two years or so. Coverage of their ADSL-networks has not expanded.
• Municipalities are cleverly moving in, building FTTH. There seems to be kind of an arms race between KPN (also buying up ISPs) trying to get involved and Reggefiber (the Dick Wessels company).
• Orange NL was put up for sale in February (rumours, but I had them sort of confirmed). Then in March, at the final 2006 results, it was denied. Now, at the Q1 results, France Telecom acknowledges all options are open. The same happened to Telecom Italia subsidiary bbned: for sale, and then all of a sudden it wasn't. This can only mean one thing: FT and TI want out, but they can't. And with market regulator NMa still studying the KPN takeover of Tiscali NL (report due May/June), KPN is no longer a buyer.

No potential buyers and LLU coming to an end - do I hear monopoly? Is duopoly the simplest answer to this? Or can altnets overcome their cultural differences and build a joint G9-style network?

Telecom Italia starts SLU trial in the Netherlands

Telecompaper reports that bbned, the Dutch wholesale internetprovider owned by Telecom Italia, is starting a VDSL trial in three Dutch towns in the Amsterdam area. For now, it appears to be a technical trial.
The infrastructure exists of fiber connected street cabinets, in which bbned installed VDSL gear. In other words, it uses SLU (sub-loop unbundling), instead of the more traditional LLU (running from MDF locations).
InterNLnet and SURFnet will retail the service. Speeds are 40/10 Mbps.
Bbned is also involved in munifiber projects.

Some remarks:

• As KPN is planning and building it's All-IP network (including nationwide FttExchange + VDSL2 by 2010), bbned appears to be the most committed altnet. This comes as no surprise. Orange (which denied being for sale, much like bbned itself) and Tiscali NL (which will be bought by KPN if the competition regulator NMa allows it) are on the sidelines. Tele2/Versatel is committed as well.
• When it comes to VDSL services, bbned is actually beating KPN. KPN is targeting a May launch, which is questionable now that the telecoms regulator OPTA is reviewing the All-IP plan and the market's response to it (due June). However, a bbned launch could support the case for an early KPN launch, as this shows that SLU is viable after all.
• Talking of which; Analysys produced a report which all but ruled out SLU conducted by altnets for lack of scale. In other words, as LLU becomes unavailable (when KPN closes and sells MDF locations), SLU may be realistic after all. This will make matters much easier for OPTA, which has to come up with an alternative to LLU.

Regulation 2.0 coming to Ireland

Battling cable, eircom apparently has similar plans to KPN: pushing fiber deeper into its network (to street cabinets), going from FttExchange + ADSL2+ (with LLU as an option) to FttCabinet + VDSL (with SLU as a theoretical option), thereby:

• creating the option of closing COs, savings costs;
• moving DSLAMs closer to end users, expanding available bandwidths;
• frustrating altnets who have DSLAMs in those COs as well but lack the scale to move them to the street cabinet level, making SLU unfeasible;
• forcing regulators to come up with some other alternative to LLU.

We have seen this in the Netherlands, and now it is spreading to Ireland. Watch out for regulation 2.0 coming to Europe in the next few years.

CONSOLIDATION://Orange NL for sale

A newspaper in the Netherlands reports France Telecom has hired Lazard to shop Orange NL around. The unit has 600k BB subs and 2.0m mobile subs and should bring in EUR 800-850m.

Observations:

• Fixed NL: KPN is forcing a choice upon altnets, building its All-IP network: retreat (or be a reseller) or step up investments to make SLU work, as the old paradigm (FTTEx + ADSL2+ = LLU from up to 1300 exchanges) is replaced by a new one (FTTN + VDSL2 = SLU from up to 28k street cabinets). The outcome is still up in the air, as OPTA seems to be backtracking on earlier support of KPN's plans, but Orange seems to think neither option is very attractive. Telecom Italia, through bbned, and Tele2/Versatel seem to be committed to the Dutch market.
• Mobile NL: The mobile market is going to a three-player model if T-Mobile or Vodafone moves in. T-Mobile could even go from a mobile-only strategy (as in the UK) to a triple play offering (as in France). Unless of course China Mobile, Weather, Telefonica, Telecom Italia, Belgacom, Swisscom, CPW or TeliaSonera (cf. Xfera in Spain) deems the time right for a new market entry.
• France Telecom: Going from 5 to 4 countries for its triple play offering (France, UK, Spain, Poland).

Consolidation is continuing, driven by a need for scale economies in mobile and LLU (not to mention SLU). More units could be put up for sale (DT France, DT Spain, Tiscali UK, Tiscali Italy, SFR). What is intriguing is:

• Companies are abandoning saturated markets, like Scandinavia and now the Netherlands (the Tiscali NL sale to KPN is pending at the NMa) and are turning to emerging markets.
• Vodafone, according to the newspaper, wouldn't be interested in Orange NL. Puzzling. Could this be the first step of Vodafone putting even more focus on emerging markets?
• If T-Mobile isn't interested, they might as well leave the market altogether.
• Telefonica is definitely a consolidator. Will they bid for Orange NL, or target the bigger prize: KPN?
• Will this be the European entry of an 'eastern' company (after Hutch and Weather)?
• As PTTs are fighting each other in their home markets, could this sale mark the formation of a pan-European kartel, e.g. FT and DT getting out of each other's markets?

UPDATE: obviously, existing players could strengthen their current presence:

• Telecom Italia: to add a retail business (and mobile) to their bbned offering.
• Tele2: to gain scale and a mobile license, in order to migrate their current reseller business.
• Scarlet: to mirror Tele2's strategy of turning into a facilities-based operator.
• Cableco: to add mobile and to sell the fixed business to somebody else.

REGULATION://Setback for KPN regarding closure of MDF locations

nwrjAs I have posted before, moving from FTTEx + ADSL2+ to FTTN + VDSL requires a Full Alternative to LLU. This is exactly what is happening in the Netherlands, where KPN is building its All-IP network. OPTA, the local regulator, today published a brief note on how it will proceed.

Back in October, OPTA was generous in recognizing that it should support KPN in moving forward, i.e. it planned to allow KPN to close many of its MDF locations. The trouble is, that is exactly where competitors' DSLAMs are colocated.

Today OPTA publishes the timeframe for how it will proceed. The note seems to include a big setback for KPN: OPTA will, for now, not proceed in making formal Policy Rules. It seems to acknowledge that SLU is not a Full Alternative to LLU. Things seem to be pretty much deadlocked.

The main points from today's note:

• Market analyses to be published 07Q2.
• The report from Analysys may be published (what does that mean?). The main conclusion is: SLU is not economically viable as an alternative to existing LLU players (unless such a network would be limited to 1000 street cabinets in the most densely populated areas).
• SLU + SDF backhaul doesn't seem to be a Full Alternative to MDF access. It appears that MDF access cannot be withdrawn (unclear is under which circumstances KPN would still be allowed to close any locations). OPTA is pondering what a Full Alternative could be and thinks it will publish the result late February.
• The NERA report on applicability of the British model (Openreach, equivalence) is to be published mid February.
• Making rules on jointly laying fiber has no priority.